A quiet wooden desk in warm morning light by a window, with a closed laptop, an open notebook with a pen across the blank page, a glass of water and a small ceramic cup, the cream wall behind left empty.
News

Concentration4 min read

Interrupted every two minutes: what that does to deep work

The average worker is now interrupted 275 times a day. Research on attention residue, the part of your mind left on the last task, shows the cost.

A morning in two-minute slices

It is 9:12 on a Tuesday. You open the quarterly plan, find the paragraph you left yesterday and read the first line. A chat pops up in the corner. You answer it, come back and read the same line again. Then an email lands. Then a meeting reminder.

Microsoft has put a number on that kind of morning. In June 2025, it published data from its workplace software showing that employees are interrupted every two minutes during core work hours, 275 times a day, by meetings, emails or chats1. The same report counts 117 emails a day for the average worker, most of them skimmed in under 60 seconds, and 153 Teams messages per weekday1.

Those figures come from anonymised usage signals up to 15 February 2025, plus a survey of 31,000 workers in 31 markets1. That is company data, not a peer-reviewed study. The research on what interruptions do to the person on the receiving end is older, and it sits in peer-reviewed journals.

Part of your mind stays on the last task

In 2009, the management researcher Sophie Leroy gave a name to that feeling of reading the same line twice: attention residue. Across two experiments, she showed that people need to stop thinking about one task before they can fully move their attention to the next one and do it well2.

We rarely get that clean stop. Leroy found it is hard to pull your attention away from an unfinished task, and your work on the next task suffers2. Even finishing the first task was not enough on its own. What helped people let go was finishing it under some time pressure2.

Leroy did not count pings in a real office. Our reading: if every switch leaves a little residue, 275 switches a day leave very little room for deep work, the long stretch where you hold a whole problem in your head.

Faster, but at a price

You might expect interrupted people to simply work slower. A 2008 lab study by Gloria Mark and colleagues at the University of California, Irvine, found something stranger. Its 48 participants, most of them university students, answered emails while being interrupted by phone or instant message3. The interruptions came every two minutes, the same rhythm Microsoft reports today3. They finished the interrupted tasks in less time, with no difference in quality3.

The bill arrived somewhere else. People made up for the interruptions by working faster, and they reported more stress, higher frustration, more time pressure and more effort3. After only 20 minutes of interrupted work, those ratings were already significantly higher3.

A 2025 survey of 354 IT employees in China, published in Frontiers in Psychology, points the same way across a whole job. Job stress partly explained the link between multitasking and lower wellbeing at work4. People with more freedom to organise their own work showed a weaker link between multitasking and stress4.

Four ways to keep a block of deep work

One of these habits has been tested directly. The others follow from what the studies describe, and none of the studies here put them to a test.

Book the block like a meeting. Put it in your calendar with a plain title, such as "writing the Q4 plan", and close chat and email for that time. Microsoft's data shows meetings filling the hours people could use for deep focus1. A block in your own calendar is a meeting nobody can move without asking you.

Write a ready-to-resume note. This is the tested one. When you have to stop, jot down where you are and what the next step is. In a 2025 field study, 50 employees kept a daily diary on four occasions5. On days with more intrusions they reported more attention residue and more exhaustion, and writing these short plans reduced the residue5.

Batch your inbox. Pick a few set times to read email and chat, and let the rest wait. Nobody in these studies tested this one. But at 117 emails a day1, answering each one as it lands is how a morning turns into two-minute slices.

Close before you switch. Leroy tested time pressure in the lab, not this exact habit. Her results suggest that a little time pressure while finishing a task helps you let go of it2. One way to use that: before a meeting, give yourself a short, fixed window to finish one small piece and mark it done.

The RYBL view

What we think

The 275 figure is an average pulled from software logs. It counts pings, and we suspect some of them are easy to ignore. Still, the lab work matches something we recognise from our own days: much of the trouble sits in the half-finished task each ping leaves behind.

So our favourite habit on this list is also the cheapest one, the ready-to-resume note. It is the only one here that was tested, and it does not depend on anyone else changing how they work. That matters in an open office or on a busy team chat.

One honest limit. Leroy's findings come from two experiments2, and Mark's from a lab study with 48 people, most of them students3. The diary study ran in the field, with real employees, but over four occasions5. The 2025 Chinese survey was cross-sectional, a single snapshot in time, so it shows a link rather than a cause4. None of the studies here followed people for more than a few days, so the long-run cost is still an open question.

And if you lead a team, look again at the autonomy finding4. In our view, giving people more say over how they organise their work is worth as much as any personal habit.

Sources


  1. 1Microsoft WorkLab, 2025. Breaking down the infinite workday. Work Trend Index special report (17 June 2025). microsoft.com (opens in a new tab)
  2. 2Leroy S, 2009. Why is it so hard to do my work? The challenge of attention residue when switching between work tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 109(2):168-181. doi.org (opens in a new tab)
  3. 3Mark G, Gudith D, Klocke U, 2008. The cost of interrupted work: more speed and stress. Proceedings of CHI 2008, ACM, 107-110. doi.org (opens in a new tab)
  4. 4Wei Z, Abdul-Ghani R, Mat N, Mat Isa R, 2025. Multitasking and workplace wellbeing: the roles of job stress and job autonomy. Frontiers in Psychology 16:1611876 (18 August 2025). pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (opens in a new tab)
  5. 5van Zoonen W, Scharp YS, 2025. Managing daily work intrusions: an intervention to reduce attention residue and exhaustion. International Journal of Stress Management 32(4):395-407. doi.org (opens in a new tab)